<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud storage and backup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/</link>
	<description>ICT &#38; the world of Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hingley</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hingley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tek-design.com/clausegge/?p=182#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Claus

Your analysis of the basics is sound as always. I&#039;ve been looking a Double-Take who have an interesting approach - launching replicated virtual servers, initially with Amazon. They are moving towards &#039;Recovery as a Service&#039;. But there are many permutations on how a large organisation may choose to address back-up when building private Clouds of course.

Best WIshes
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claus</p>
<p>Your analysis of the basics is sound as always. I&#8217;ve been looking a Double-Take who have an interesting approach &#8211; launching replicated virtual servers, initially with Amazon. They are moving towards &#8216;Recovery as a Service&#8217;. But there are many permutations on how a large organisation may choose to address back-up when building private Clouds of course.</p>
<p>Best WIshes<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cegge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>cegge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tek-design.com/clausegge/?p=182#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Thanks. CDP is a good concept for capturing updates only. I look forward to learn more about R1Soft as a cloud based target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. CDP is a good concept for capturing updates only. I look forward to learn more about R1Soft as a cloud based target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McArthur</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>John McArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tek-design.com/clausegge/?p=182#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Claus, 

Thanks for the post. 

One of my clients, R1Soft, enables cloud-based data-protection services, but it starts with the outsourcing of web-hosting.  Cloud-resident applciations are, I believe, another beach head for cloud-based storage services.  It&#039;s an extension of the application.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claus, </p>
<p>Thanks for the post. </p>
<p>One of my clients, R1Soft, enables cloud-based data-protection services, but it starts with the outsourcing of web-hosting.  Cloud-resident applciations are, I believe, another beach head for cloud-based storage services.  It&#8217;s an extension of the application.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

