<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Claus Egge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clausegge.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clausegge.com</link>
	<description>ICT &#38; the world of Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unified Computing Platforms &amp; Why We Need Them by Federated, Unified, Converged and more types of Storage &#124; Claus Egge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/04/unified-computing-platforms-why-we-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Federated, Unified, Converged and more types of Storage &#124; Claus Egge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=227#comment-529</guid>
		<description>[...] server, storage, software etc. Here the HDS solution called unified computing was announced Unified Computing. Would it make more sense to call this converged IT? Yes, if it is about bringing out complete [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] server, storage, software etc. Here the HDS solution called unified computing was announced Unified Computing. Would it make more sense to call this converged IT? Yes, if it is about bringing out complete [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tintri &#8211; Storage Engineered for VMware by Chris Wahl</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2012/02/tintri-storage-engineered-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=562#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Always good to see more buzz around Tintri. I&#039;ve been using their product (T440/445 and later the T540) for quite some time now and have been impressed with both the performance and ease of management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always good to see more buzz around Tintri. I&#8217;ve been using their product (T440/445 and later the T540) for quite some time now and have been impressed with both the performance and ease of management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage and Busy Hypervisors by Tintri &#8211; Storage Engineered for VMware &#124; Claus Egge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2011/04/storage-and-busy-hypovisors/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Tintri &#8211; Storage Engineered for VMware &#124; Claus Egge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tek-design.com/clausegge/?p=431#comment-484</guid>
		<description>[...] Server hypervisors improves utilisation, but what about the attached storage? In fact the server hypervisors are so successful in improving the ability to drive up virtual and physical workloads, that storage can become a casualty. As discussed here earlier. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Server hypervisors improves utilisation, but what about the attached storage? In fact the server hypervisors are so successful in improving the ability to drive up virtual and physical workloads, that storage can become a casualty. As discussed here earlier. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dell Storage Forum Comes to London by Gina Minks - Dell Storage Forum London &#8211; the big fat review post</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2012/01/dell-storage-forum-london/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Minks - Dell Storage Forum London &#8211; the big fat review post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=551#comment-401</guid>
		<description>[...] Dell Storage Forum comes to London [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dell Storage Forum comes to London [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dell Accelerates Its Storage Strategy by Dell Storage Forum Comes to London &#124; Claus Egge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2011/06/dell-accelerates-its-storage-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell Storage Forum Comes to London &#124; Claus Egge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=465#comment-345</guid>
		<description>[...] today in London. It was similar in format to the Florida event I attended, about which I wrote this post. This meant senior execs flying in to first of all meet customers, but also channel partners, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today in London. It was similar in format to the Florida event I attended, about which I wrote this post. This meant senior execs flying in to first of all meet customers, but also channel partners, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Replify Co-operative LAN by Bridgeworks SANSlide &#8211; Virtualising the TCP/IP Stream &#124; Claus Egge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2011/05/replify-co-operative-lan/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridgeworks SANSlide &#8211; Virtualising the TCP/IP Stream &#124; Claus Egge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tek-design.com/clausegge/?p=449#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] Which is seen in the case of WAN optimisation by companies such as Riverbed or Replify my previous blog post  where chattiness and added data could be eradicated. There is another in-efficiency in TCP/IP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which is seen in the case of WAN optimisation by companies such as Riverbed or Replify my previous blog post  where chattiness and added data could be eradicated. There is another in-efficiency in TCP/IP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud Storage Providers, Access Points &amp; Networks &#8211; Visiting Redstor by microsoft cloud</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2011/01/cloud-storage-providers-access-points-networks-visiting-redstor/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>microsoft cloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=344#comment-318</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;microsoft cloud...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Cloud Storage Providers, Access Points &amp; Networks &#8211; Visiting Redstor &#124; Claus Egge[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>microsoft cloud&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Cloud Storage Providers, Access Points &#038; Networks &#8211; Visiting Redstor | Claus Egge[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Object Storage – A New Proposition? by Object Storage – A New Proposition? &#171; Storage CH Blog</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2011/11/object-storage-%e2%80%93-proposition/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Object Storage – A New Proposition? &#171; Storage CH Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=520#comment-316</guid>
		<description>[...] One group of computer scientists quickly finds flaws with the status quo and looks at doing things differently. In the case of databases these were only the answer to some of the needs because they brought with them their own set of restrictions. Object storage is using a separate layer above the file system but is different from a database. The motivation for doing things differently lies in the reality of the computing schema combined with what problems object based storage is trying to fix. A parallel is CAS [1] footnote. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One group of computer scientists quickly finds flaws with the status quo and looks at doing things differently. In the case of databases these were only the answer to some of the needs because they brought with them their own set of restrictions. Object storage is using a separate layer above the file system but is different from a database. The motivation for doing things differently lies in the reality of the computing schema combined with what problems object based storage is trying to fix. A parallel is CAS [1] footnote. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on De-mystifying VCE by cegge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2011/10/de-mystifying-vce/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>cegge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=506#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Scott: correct, and updated. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott: correct, and updated. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on De-mystifying VCE by Scott</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2011/10/de-mystifying-vce/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=506#comment-297</guid>
		<description>There is one typographical error that I need to correct.  Cisco provides the Nexus and MDS switches in the Vblock, your blog states VNX / MDS switches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one typographical error that I need to correct.  Cisco provides the Nexus and MDS switches in the Vblock, your blog states VNX / MDS switches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

