<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Claus Egge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clausegge.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clausegge.com</link>
	<description>ICT &#38; the world of Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3PAR Profile &#8211; Summer 2010 by HP Acquires 3Par For $2.35 Billion &#8211; Expensive, But Positive, News &#171; Martin Hingley&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/08/3par-profile-summer-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>HP Acquires 3Par For $2.35 Billion &#8211; Expensive, But Positive, News &#171; Martin Hingley&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=267#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] $194 million. For readers interested in knowing more I suggest you look at Claus Egge’s excellent analysis. I believe that IBM might well join Dell on the acquisition trail for other likely candidates, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $194 million. For readers interested in knowing more I suggest you look at Claus Egge’s excellent analysis. I believe that IBM might well join Dell on the acquisition trail for other likely candidates, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 3rd Option by Axxana by Martin Hingley</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/06/the-3rd-option-by-axxana/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hingley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=249#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Claus
When meeting Axxana I was impressed with the simplicity of their solution and the way in which they seem to be dealing with these &#039;speed of light&#039; issues. Your post deals with the technical issues for DR well. It&#039;ll be interesting to see if and when more OEMs sign up for the Phoenix Blackbox.
Best Wishes
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claus<br />
When meeting Axxana I was impressed with the simplicity of their solution and the way in which they seem to be dealing with these &#8216;speed of light&#8217; issues. Your post deals with the technical issues for DR well. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if and when more OEMs sign up for the Phoenix Blackbox.<br />
Best Wishes<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infosecurity 2010 Reflections by Martin Hingley</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/04/infosecurity-2010-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hingley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=238#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Claus
It&#039;s going to get even more difficult with Cloud Computing. If I&#039;m right in thinking that users don&#039;t care, don&#039;t know and in many cases can&#039;t find out where their personal data is located, then the regulators job becomes vital.
In the UK they&#039;re tightening up on financial regulation in the Retail industry in October, but can&#039;t even handle virtual servers. Cloud applications will be excluded unless they gain a lot of knowledge before then. If they got turbo boosted they might even help to protect the local Managed Services market by encapsulating governence, data and privacy information issues in their rules, but it doesn&#039;t look likely.
For the IT managers of services companies, focusing on issues of trust will help protect their organisations from legal action. However it&#039;s going to get even more difficult to handle the balance between modern applications, customer and citizen privacy.
Can you tell us about the techniques they might develop to cope?
Best Wishes
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claus<br />
It&#8217;s going to get even more difficult with Cloud Computing. If I&#8217;m right in thinking that users don&#8217;t care, don&#8217;t know and in many cases can&#8217;t find out where their personal data is located, then the regulators job becomes vital.<br />
In the UK they&#8217;re tightening up on financial regulation in the Retail industry in October, but can&#8217;t even handle virtual servers. Cloud applications will be excluded unless they gain a lot of knowledge before then. If they got turbo boosted they might even help to protect the local Managed Services market by encapsulating governence, data and privacy information issues in their rules, but it doesn&#8217;t look likely.<br />
For the IT managers of services companies, focusing on issues of trust will help protect their organisations from legal action. However it&#8217;s going to get even more difficult to handle the balance between modern applications, customer and citizen privacy.<br />
Can you tell us about the techniques they might develop to cope?<br />
Best Wishes<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dot Hill Aims To Raise Its Storage Systems Profile Through Channel, OEM And Software Activities by Dot Hill Aims To Raise Its Storage Systems Profile Through Channel, OEM And Software Activities &#171; Martin Hingley&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/03/why-dot-hill%e2%80%99s-diversified-strategy-helps-its-oem-business/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot Hill Aims To Raise Its Storage Systems Profile Through Channel, OEM And Software Activities &#171; Martin Hingley&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=201#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] article is also available on clausegge.com. Please his web site at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article is also available on clausegge.com. Please his web site at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud storage and back-up by Martin Hingley</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hingley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=182#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Claus

Your analysis of the basics is sound as always. I&#039;ve been looking a Double-Take who have an interesting approach - launching replicated virtual servers, initially with Amazon. They are moving towards &#039;Recovery as a Service&#039;. But there are many permutations on how a large organisation may choose to address back-up when building private Clouds of course.

Best WIshes
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claus</p>
<p>Your analysis of the basics is sound as always. I&#8217;ve been looking a Double-Take who have an interesting approach &#8211; launching replicated virtual servers, initially with Amazon. They are moving towards &#8216;Recovery as a Service&#8217;. But there are many permutations on how a large organisation may choose to address back-up when building private Clouds of course.</p>
<p>Best WIshes<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud storage and back-up by cegge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>cegge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=182#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Thanks. CDP is a good concept for capturing updates only. I look forward to learn more about R1Soft as a cloud based target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. CDP is a good concept for capturing updates only. I look forward to learn more about R1Soft as a cloud based target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud storage and back-up by John McArthur</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/cloud-storage-and-back-up/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>John McArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=182#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Claus, 

Thanks for the post. 

One of my clients, R1Soft, enables cloud-based data-protection services, but it starts with the outsourcing of web-hosting.  Cloud-resident applciations are, I believe, another beach head for cloud-based storage services.  It&#039;s an extension of the application.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claus, </p>
<p>Thanks for the post. </p>
<p>One of my clients, R1Soft, enables cloud-based data-protection services, but it starts with the outsourcing of web-hosting.  Cloud-resident applciations are, I believe, another beach head for cloud-based storage services.  It&#8217;s an extension of the application.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommVault plugs into the Cloud by cegge</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/02/commvault-plugs-into-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>cegge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=178#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Following a phone update with CommVault today, I just want to highlight that CommVault&#039;s Farline enables back-up and archive in Cloud rather than online-storage in Cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following a phone update with CommVault today, I just want to highlight that CommVault&#8217;s Farline enables back-up and archive in Cloud rather than online-storage in Cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Symantec’s double-barrel back-up upgrade by Symantec De-Dupe Offers To Reduce Storage and Communications Costs &#171; Martin Hingley&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/01/symantec%e2%80%99s-double-barrel-back-up-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Symantec De-Dupe Offers To Reduce Storage and Communications Costs &#171; Martin Hingley&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=159#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] them the first standard integration of de-duplication techniques. Please read Claus Egge&#8217;s analysis for a more detailed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] them the first standard integration of de-duplication techniques. Please read Claus Egge&#8217;s analysis for a more detailed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Symantec’s double-barrel back-up upgrade by Martin HIngley</title>
		<link>http://clausegge.com/2010/01/symantec%e2%80%99s-double-barrel-back-up-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin HIngley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clausegge.com/?p=159#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Claus
For me the announcement is typical how data centre &#039;component&#039; suppliers vie for position in a downturn. The IT budget has gone down - so if Symantec can reduce storage systems and communications spending through de-dupe, IT managers spending will go down despite the extra software costs. At least that&#039;s the idea.
Oracle, VMWare, Microsoft have all succeeded at various times in the past. I believe Symantec will have a good go this time.
Best Wishes
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claus<br />
For me the announcement is typical how data centre &#8216;component&#8217; suppliers vie for position in a downturn. The IT budget has gone down &#8211; so if Symantec can reduce storage systems and communications spending through de-dupe, IT managers spending will go down despite the extra software costs. At least that&#8217;s the idea.<br />
Oracle, VMWare, Microsoft have all succeeded at various times in the past. I believe Symantec will have a good go this time.<br />
Best Wishes<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
